The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued a landmark advisory opinion declaring a "clean, healthy and sustainable environment" a human right. The ruling, delivered on [Date], states that failure to protect the planet from climate change may violate international law. ICJ President Yuji Iwasawa emphasized that greenhouse gas emissions have cross-border effects and pose an "urgent and existential threat." The court outlined states' duty to cooperate in preventing climate harm and setting ambitious national climate targets.

The decision was welcomed by climate activists, including Vishal Prasad of Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change, who called it a "lifeline" for vulnerable communities. Mary Robinson, former President of Ireland, described it as a "powerful new tool" to protect people from climate change's impacts. The case was initiated following lobbying by Pacific Island students, with Vanuatu requesting the ICJ's clarification on states' legal obligations. The court heard testimonies from numerous countries and international organizations.

The ICJ advisory opinion, while not legally binding, carries significant legal weight and moral authority. It's expected to influence climate litigation and the upcoming COP30 negotiations. The ruling highlights the accountability of nations for climate change impacts and the need to move beyond "empty pledges." Experts anticipate it will be a crucial tool in holding governments accountable for climate action.

Impact Statement: The ICJ ruling significantly strengthens the legal basis for climate action, potentially impacting future litigation and international negotiations on climate change mitigation and adaptation.